Mixed linear models in the research agriculture and livestock

Authors

  • Érica M Pereira
  • Geraldo A Gravina
  • José Tarcísio L Thiébaut

Abstract

The mixed models have been traditionally studied by means of variance analysis in which variance components are estimated by a linear model solution. For mixed model analysis some points are relevant: the prediction of random effects, tests upon and estimation of variance components, and estimation and tests of hypothesis upon fixed effects. In the analysis of unbalanced linear mixed models the problem is not that simple and the use of the SAS program (SAS System Inc., Cary, NC, USA) is preferable, which demand a proper understanding of the theoretical background because of a proper modeling of the structure of the variance-covariance matrix and the choice of the estimation method is required. In the MIXED procedure are available the ML (Maximum Likelihood), REML (Restricted Maximum Likelihood), and MIVQUE (Minimum Variance Quadratic Unbiased) as described respectively by Hartley e Rao (1967), Rao (1971a), and Patterson e Thompson (1971). For an optimized use of SAS it is rather necessary to define the appropriate type of sum of squares: SS1, SS2, SS3, or SS4. Because of its properties the use of REML is recommended and for unbalanced data the SS3 type is the appropriate choice. With balanced data the four types of sum of squares yield the same results.

Keywords:

mixed models, randomized design, balanced, SAS genes

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Érica M Pereira

Estudante de Pós-Graduação - LEAG/CCTA/UENF.

Geraldo A Gravina

Estudante de Pós-Graduação - LEAG/CCTA/UENF.

José Tarcísio L Thiébaut

Professor Assocido - LEAG//CCTA/UENF.

References

Analla M, Sanchez-Palma A, Munoz-Serrano A, Serradilla JM (1995) Simulation analysis with BLUP methodology of different data structures in goat selection schemes in Spain. Small Ruminant Research 17: 51-55.

Bereskin B, Lush JL (1965) Genetic and environmental factors in dairy sire evaluation. III. Influence of environmental and others extraneous correlations among the daughters. Journal of Dairy Science 48: 356-360.

Boldman KG, Freeman AE (1990) Adjustment for heterogeneity of variances by herd production level in dairy cow and sire evaluation. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 503-512.

Boldman KG, van Vleck LD (1991) Derivative-free restricted maximum likelihood estimation in animal models with a sparse matrix solver. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 4337-4343.

Dickerson GE (1962) Implications of genetic-environmental interactions in animal breeding. Animal Production 4: 47-57.

Dodenhoff J, Swalve HH (1998) Heterogeneity of variances across regions of northern Germany and adjustment in genetic evaluation. Livestock Production Science 53: 225-236.

Dong MC, Mad IL (1990) Heterogeneity of (co)variance and heritability in different levels of intra herd milk production and of herd average. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 843-851.

Falconer DS (1952) The problem of environment and selection. American Naturalist 86: 293-298.

Foulley JL, Im S, Gianola D, Höschele I (1987) Empirical Bayes estimation of parameters for n polygenic binary traits. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 19: 197-224.

Hartley HO, Rao JNK (1967) Maximum-likelihood estimation for the mixed analysis of variance model. Biometrika 54: 93-108.

Henderson CR (1953) Estimation of variance and covariance components. Biometrika 9: 226-52.

Kennedy BW (1975) Comparison of genetic group and relationship methods for mixed model sire evaluation. Journal of Dairy Science 58: l507-15144,.

Kennedy BW (1988) Workshop on estimation of breeding values with the animal model. Guelph, Ontario: University of Guelph.

Lush J. (1945) The Built Index problem in the light of modern genetics. Journal of Dairy Science 16: 501-522.

Meyer DJ (1987) The management of cytology specimens. Compendium on Continuing Education - Small Animal Practice 9: 10-17.

Meyer K (1989) Restricted maximum likelihood to estimate variance components for animal models with several random effects using a derivative-free algorithm. Genetics, CelectionEvolution 21: 317-340.

Mirande SL, Van Vleck LD (1985) Trends in genetic and phenotypic variances for milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 2278-2286.

Mohammad WA, Lee AJ, Grossman M (1982) Genotype-environment interaction in sire evaluation. Journal of Dairy Science 65: 857-860.

Ojala M, Syvajarvi J, Hellman T (1984) Effect of the size of the comparison on the accuracy of a sire’s evaluation. Journal of Animal Breeding 102: 91-94.

Patterson HD, Thompson R (1971) Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545-554.

Rao CR (1970) Estimation of heteroscedastic variance in linear models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65: 161-172.

Rao CR (1971a) Minimum variance quadratic unbiased estimation of variance components. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 1: 445-456.

Rao CR (1971b) Estimation of variance and covariance components minque theory. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 1: 257-275.

Rao R (1972) Estimation of variance and covariance components in linear models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 67: 112-115.

Robertson A, O’Connor LK, Edwards J (1960) Progeny testing dairy bulls at different management levels. Animal Production 2: 141-152.

Schaeffer LR(1978) Simultaneous estimation of variance and covariances components from multitrait mixed model equations. Biometrics 34: 199-208.

Schenkel FS (1991) Aplicação da metodologia de modelos mistos na avaliação genética de suínos. Dissertação Mestrado. Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

Searle SR (1971) Topics in variance component estimation. Biometrics 27: 1-76.

Searle SR (1982) Matrix Algebra Useful to Statistics. New York, John Wiley and Sons.

Searle S, Casella G, McCulloc CE (1992) Variance Components. New York, John Wiley and Sons.

Short RE, Bellows RA, Staigmiller RB, Berardinelli JG, Custer EE (1990) Physiological mechanisms controlling anestrus and infertility in postpartum beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 68: 799-816.

Spike PL, Freeman AE (1978) Prediction of genetic differences among herds with estimates of breeding values. Journal of Dairy Science 61: 1476-1482.

Stanton TL, Blake RW, Van Vleck LD, Quaas RL (1991) Genotype by environment interaction for Holstein milk yield in Colombia, Mexico, and Porto Rico. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 1700-1714.

Tong AKW, Kennedy BW, Moxley JE (1980) Potential errors in sire evaluation from regional genetic differences. Journal of Dairy Science 63: 627-633.

Torres RA (1998) Efeito da heterogeneidade de variância na avaliação genética de bovinos da raça holandesa no Brasil. Belo Horizonte, UFMG.

How to Cite

Pereira, Érica M., Gravina, G. A., & Thiébaut, J. T. L. (2012). Mixed linear models in the research agriculture and livestock. Natureza Online, 10(2), 52–58. Retrieved from https://naturezaonline.com.br/revista/article/view/298

Most read articles by the same author(s)