Effect of zooplankton predation on phytoplankton communities in a small reservoir in a Tabuleiro Forest, southeastern Brazil

Authors

  • Karla G Gnocchi Universidade Vila Velha
  • Taciana O Miranda Universidade Vila Velha
  • Marcelo S Moretti Universidade Vila Velha

Abstract

Phytoplankton is the name given to a community of photoautotrophic organisms that live most of their life cycle in the pelagic zone of oceans, lakes, ponds and reservoirs. There are many factors affecting the development and control of the phytoplankton, so that the most adapted species to the environmental conditions are able to remain in the environment. In freshwater environments, the zooplankton community is characterized by high species richness, being composed by different groups of invertebrate predators of algae such as protozoa, rotifers, cladocerans and copepods. Among the biological factors controlling phytoplankton populations, predation by zooplankton is a major one. The Vale Nature Reserve is located in the north of the Espírito Santo, between the municipalities of Linhares and Jaguaré, and presents an area of 22,000 ha, altitudes between 28-65 m and warm and humid climate with rainy summer and dry winter. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of predation of zooplankton on the phytoplankton communities. Eighteen litters of water were collected on the surface of the reservoir. After collection, six microcosms were set in the laboratory in transparent plastic chambers containing 3 liters of water each. Three of them served as controls and in the other three (experiment), zooplankton organisms were removed by filtration of the water on 250 mm mesh. The phytoplankton community of each microcosm was analyzed qualitatively and the population density was estimated by the sedimentation method. The counting procedure used was the random fields, where 6 slides of 0.5 ml were analyzed for each microcosm, totaling 18 slides per treatment. The results were expressed as density. The Student t-test looks for significant biological differences among different groups of phytoplankton (Classes) between the two treatments. The phytoplankton communities were represented by the classes Cyanophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Zygnemaphyceae, Bacillariophyceae and Euglenophyceae were found. The phytoplankton density showed significant differences among the treatments studied for the class Chlorophyceae. The cyanobacteria have benefited at the expense of green algae in the absence of herbivores. The Chlorophyceae represent preferred food source for zooplankton, since they have thin cell walls, resulting in a high ratio organic carbon: dry weight ratio.

Keywords:

herbivory, microcosmos, trophic interactions

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Karla G Gnocchi, Universidade Vila Velha

Laboratório de Ictiologia Aplicada; Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ecossistemas – PPEE. Universidade Vila Velha – UVV.

Taciana O Miranda, Universidade Vila Velha

Laboratório de Ictiologia Aplicada; Bolsista FAPES de Doutorado; Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ecossistemas – PPEE. Universidade Vila Velha – UVV.

Marcelo S Moretti, Universidade Vila Velha

Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ecossistemas – PPEE. Universidade Vila Velha – UVV. Professor Titular, Laboratório de Ecologia de Insetos Aquáticos.

References

Bicudo CEM, Menezes M (2006) Gêneros de Algas de Águas Continentais do Brasil. São Carlos, Rima.

Happey-Wood CM (1988) Ecology of freshwater planktonic green algae. In: Sandgren CD (org) Growth and Reproductive Strategies of Freshwater Phytoplankton. Crambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 175–226.

Müller CC, Cybis LF, Raya-Rodriguez MT (2012) Monitoramento do fitoplâncton para a qualidade de água para abastecimento público – estudo de caso de mananciais do Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos 17: 203–211.

Paerl HW. Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater blue-green algae. In: Sandgren CD (org) Growth and Reproductive Strategies of Freshwater Phytoplankton.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 261–315.

Redfield AC, Ketchum BH, Richards FA (1963) The influence of organisms on the composition of sea-water. In: Hill MN (org) The Sea. New York, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 26–77.

Reynolds, CS, George, DG (1997) Zooplankton-phytoplankton interactions: the case for refining methods, measurements and models. Aquatic Ecology 31: 59-71.

Reynolds CS (2006) Ecolog y of Phytoplankton (Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Rocha O, Sendacz S, Matsumura-Tundisi T (1995) Composition, Biomass and productivity of zooplâncton in natural lakes and reservoirs of Brazil. In: Tundisi JG, Bicudo CEM, Matsumura-Tundisi (org) Limnolog y in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro, ABC/SBL, pp 151–166.

Shaw JL, Moore M, Kennedy JH, Hill IR (1994) Design and stastitical analysis od field aquatic mesocosm studies. In: Graney RL, Kennedy JH, Rodgers JH (org) Aquatic Mesocosm Studies in Ecological Risk Assessment. Florida,CRC Press, pp 85–104.

Sipaúba-Tavares LH, Rocha O (1984). Estudo do crescimento das larvas de Oreochromis niloticus alimentadas exclusivamente com algas e zooplâncton cultivados em laboratório. In: Anais do VI Simpósio Latino- americano e V Simpósio Brasileiro de Aquicultura, Florianópolis.

Tundisi JG, Matsumura-Tundisi T (2008) Limnologia. São Paulo, Oficina de Textos.

Utermöhl H (1958). Zur Vervollekommung der quantitativen Phytoplankton - methodik. Mitt Int Verein Theor Angeu. Limnolog y 9: 1–38.

Villac MC, Cabral-Noronha VAP, Pinto TO (2008) The phytoplankton biodiversity of the coast of the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Biota Neotropica 8: 151–173.

How to Cite

Gnocchi, K. G., Miranda, T. O., & Moretti, M. S. (2014). Effect of zooplankton predation on phytoplankton communities in a small reservoir in a Tabuleiro Forest, southeastern Brazil. Natureza Online, 12(5), 250–243. Retrieved from https://naturezaonline.com.br/revista/article/view/229

Most read articles by the same author(s)