The usefulness of different methods for biodiversity surveys in the Amazonia/Cerrado ecotone

Autores/as

  • Rita G Rocha Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Universidade de Aveiro e Universidade Federal do Tocantins
  • Eduardo Ferreira Universidade de Aveiro e Universidade Federal do Tocantins
  • Andreia Serafini Università degli Studi della Tuscia
  • Leonora P Costa Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
  • António JA Nogueira Universidade de Aveiro
  • Adriana Malvasio Universidade Federal do Tocantins
  • Iracy CM Martins Universidade Federal do Tocantins
  • Carlos Fonseca Universidade de Aveiro

Resumen

Small mammals and herpetofauna were surveyed in the Amazonia/Cerrado ecotone and the capture effectiveness in terms of capture rates and species richness of live traps (Sherman and Tomahawk) and pitfalls (30 L and 60 L) was compared. We also evaluated if these methods alone could accurately estimate local species richness, by using additional methods. Sixty-five small vertebrate species were captured, 29 amphibian, 18 lizard and 18 small mammal species. Larger pitfalls captured significantly more individuals than the smaller ones, but did not capture more species of any taxonomic group. When comparing live traps, sherman traps captured significantly more cricetids, while Tomahawk traps captured more didelphids and teiids. Pitfalls captured significantly more small mammal species than live traps. Pitfalls were the less selective method and reveal to be very useful even in short-term biodiversity surveys. Additional sampling methods substantially increased the number of recorded species, mostly herpetofauna. A combination of pitfalls and live traps is adequate for sampling small mammals in the ecotone but is be insufficient for herpetofauna. Additionally, we present the relative costs and effort associated with each method and discuss their merits and drawbacks.

Palabras clave:

active search, Brazil, capture effectiveness, live traps, pipe refuges, pitfalls

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Rita G Rocha, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Universidade de Aveiro e Universidade Federal do Tocantins

Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Departamento de Biologia & CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro e Laboratório de Impacto Ambiental, Universidade Federal do Tocantins.

Eduardo Ferreira, Universidade de Aveiro e Universidade Federal do Tocantins

Departamento de Biologia & CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro e Laboratório de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Tocantins.

Andreia Serafini, Università degli Studi della Tuscia

Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Università degli Studi della Tuscia.

Leonora P Costa, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo.

António JA Nogueira, Universidade de Aveiro

Departamento de Biologia & CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro.

Adriana Malvasio, Universidade Federal do Tocantins

Laboratório de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Tocantins.

Iracy CM Martins, Universidade Federal do Tocantins

Laboratório de Impacto Ambiental, Universidade Federal do Tocantins.

Carlos Fonseca, Universidade de Aveiro

Departamento de Biologia & CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro.

Citas

Azevedo-Ramos C, Galatti U (2002) Patterns of amphibian diversity in Brazilian Amazonia: conservation implications. Biological Conservation 103: 103–111.

Bini LM, Dinis-Filho JA, Rangel TFLVB, Bastos RP, Pinto MP (2006) Challenging Wallacean and Linnean shortfalls: knowledge gradients and conservation planning in a Biodiversity hotspot. Diversity Distribution 12: 475–482.

Barreto L, Andrade GV (1995) Aspects of the reproductive biology of Physalaemus cuvieri (Anura:Leptodactylidae) in northeastern Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia 16: 67–76.

Brasileiro CA, Sawaya RJ, Kiefer MC, Martins M (2005) Amphibians of an open cerrado fragment in southeastern Brazil. Biota Neotropica 5: 93–109.

Cáceres NC, Nápoli RP, Hannibal W (2011) Differential trapping success for small mammals using pitfall and standard cage traps in a woodland savannah region of southwestern Brazil. Mammalia 75: 45–52.

Cavalcanti RB, Joly CA (2002) Biodiversity and Conservation priorities in the Cerrado region. In: Oliveira PS, Marquis RJ (Org) The Cerrados of Brazil – Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna. New York, Columbia University Press, pp 351–367.

Cechin SZ, Martinz M (2000) Eficiência de armadilhas de queda (pitfall traps) em amostragens de anfíbios e répteis no Brasil. Revista Brasileira Zoologia 17: 729–740.

Colwell RK (2013) EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. User’s Guide and application published at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates (last access in 17/07/2013).

Cooper WEJr (2007) Lizard chemical senses, chemosensory behaviour, and foraging mode. In: Reilly SM, McBrayer LB, Miles DB (org) Lizard Ecology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 237–270.

Costa FRC, Magnusson WE (2010) The need for large-scale, integrated studies of biodiversity – the experience of the program for biodiversity research in Brazilian Amazonia. Natureza & Conservaçao 8: 3–12.

Crosswhite DL, Fox SF, Thrill RE (1999) Comparison of methods for monitoring reptiles and amphibians in upland forests of the Ouachita Mountains. Proceeding of the Oklahoma Academy of Sciences 79: 45–50.

Dersimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in Clinical Trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 7(3): 177–188.

Emmons LH, Feer F (1997) Neotropical Rainforest Mammals – A field guide. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

Ferreira E, Rocha RG, Malvasio A, Fonseca C (2012) Pipe refuge occupancy by herpetofauna in the Amazonia/Cerrado ecotone. Herpetological

Journal 22: 59–62.

Gibbons JW, Bennett DH (1974) Determination of anuran terrestrial activity patterns by a drift fence method. Copeia 1974: 236–243.

Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecological Letters 4: 379–391.

Greenberg CH, Neary DG, Harris LD (1994) A comparison of herpetofaunal sampling effectiveness of pitfall, single-ended, and double-ended funnel traps used with drift fences. Journal of Herpetology 28(3): 319–324.

Hice CL, Schmidly DJ (2002) The effectiveness of pitfall traps for sampling small mammals in the Amazon basin. Mastozoologia Neotropical 9: 85–59.

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal 327(7414): 557–560.

Hutchens SJ, Deperno CS (2009) Efficacy of sampling techniques for determining species richness estimates of reptiles and amphibians. Wildlife Biology 15: 113–122.

INMET (2011) Normais Climatológicas – dados de 1961 a 1991. Brazil: Instituto Nacional de Metereologia. Available from http://www.inmet.gov.br. (last access in 14/03/2011).

Johnson JA (2005) A novel arboreal pipe-trap designed to capture the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor). Herpetological Review 36: 274–277.

Johnson JR, Mahan RD, Semlitsch RD (2008) Seasonal terrestrial microhabitat use by gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor) in Missouri Oak- Hickory forests. Herpetologica 64: 259–269.

Klink CA, Machado RB (2005) Conservation of Brazilian Cerrado. Conservation Biology 19: 707–713.

Lambert TD, Malcolm JR, Zimmerman BL (2005) Variation in small mammal species richness by trap height and trap type in Southeastern Amazonia. Journal of Mammalogy 86: 982–990.

Leite YLR, Costa LP, Stalling JR (1996) Diet and vertical space use of three sympatric opossums in a Brazilian Atlantic forest reserve. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 435–440.

Lyra-Jorge MC, Pivello VR (2001) Combining live trap and pitfall to survey terrestrial small mammals in savanna and forest habitats, in Brazil. Mammalia 65: 524–530.

Malcolm JR (1991) Comparative abundances of Neotropical small mammals by trap height. Journal of Mammalogy 72: 188–192.

Magurran AE(2004) Measuring Biological Diversity. Oxford, Blackwell Science.

Marinho-Filho J, Rodrigues FHG, Juarez KM (2002) The Cerrado mammals: diversity, ecology, and natural history. In: Oliveira PS, Marquis RJ (Org) The Cerrados of Brazil – Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna. New York, Columbia University Press, pp 266–284.

Mengak MT, Guynn DCJr (1987) Pitfalls and snap traps for sampling small mammals and herpetofauna. American Midland Naturalist 118: 284–288.

Mittermeier RA, Myers N, Thomsen JB, Fonseca GABda, Oliveira S (1998) Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conservation Biology 12: 515–520.

Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GABda, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.

O’Farrell MJ, Clark WA, Emmerson FH, Juarez SM, Kay FR, O’Farrell TM, Goodlett TY (1994) Use of a mesh live trap for small mammals: are results from Sherman live-traps deceptive? Journal of Mammalogy 75: 692–699.

Oliveira-Filho AT, Ratter JA (2002) Vegetation phygsionomies and woody flora of the Cerrado biome. In: Oliveira PS, Marquis RJ (org) The Cerrados of Brazil – Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna. New York, Columbia University Press, pp 91–120.

Pittman SE, Jendrek AL, Price SJ, Dorcas ME (2008) Habitat selection and site fidelity of Cope’s gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) at the aquatic- terrestrial ecotone. Journal of Herpetology 42: 378–385.

Ribeiro-Júnior MA, Gardner TA, Ávila-Pires TCS(2008) Evaluating the effectiveness of herpetofaunal sampling techniques across a gradient of habitat change in a tropical forest landscape. Journal of Herpetology 42: 733–749.

Ribeiro-Júnior MA, Rossi RV, Miranda CL, & Ávila-Pires TCS (2011) Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest. Zoologia 28: 80–91.

Rocha RG, Ferreira E, Costa MBA, Martins ICM, Leite YLR, Costa LP, Fonseca C (2011) Small mammals of the mid-Araguaia River in Central Brazil, with the description of a new species of climbing rat. Zootaxa 2789: 1–34.

Rodrigues DJ, Lopes FS, Uetanbaro M (2003) Padrão reprodutivo de Elachistocleis bicolor (Anura, Microhylidae) na Serra da Bodoquena, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia Serie Zoologia 93: 365–371.

Schemnitz SD (1996) Capturing and handling wild animals. In: Bookhout TA (org) Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitats. Bethesda, The Wildlife Society, pp 106–124.

Sealander JA, James D (1958) Relative efficiency of different small mammal traps. Journal of Mammalogy 39: 215–223.

Slade NA, Eifler MA, Gruenhagen NM, Davelos AL (1993) Differential effectiveness of standard and long Sherman livetraps in capturing small mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 74: 156–161.

Thompson SA, Thompson GG, Withers PC (2005) Influence of pit-trap type on the interpretation of fauna diversity. Wildlife Research 32: 131–137.

Townsend CR, Begon M, Harper JL (2008) Essentials in Ecology. Blackwell Science, Malden.

Umetsu F, Naxara L, Pardini R (2006) Evaluating the efficiency of pitfall traps for sampling small mammals in the Neotropics. Journal of Mammalogy 87: 757–765.

Vieira EM (1998) A technique for trapping small mammals in the forest canopy. Mammalia 62: 306–310.

Vieira MV (2003) Seasonal Niche Dynamics in Coexisting Rodents of the Brazilian Cerrado. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 38: 7–15.

Vieira MV, Gentile R, Grelle CEV (2004) Differential trappability of small mammals in three habitats of Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 64: 895–900.

Vitt LJ, Shepard DB, Caldwell JP, Vieira GHC, França FGR, Colli GR (2007) Living with your food: geckos in termitaria of Cantão. Journal of Zoology 272: 321–328.

Voss RS, Emmons LH (1996) Mammalian diversity in Neotropical lowland rainforests: a preliminary assessment. Bulletin of American Museum of Natural History 230: 1–115.

Welch BL (1947) The generalization of “Student’s” problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34:28–35.

Woodman N, Timm RM, Slade NA, Doonan TJ (1996) Comparison of traps and baits for censusing small mammals in Neotropical lowlands. Journal of Mammalogy 77: 274–281.

Publicado:

2015-01-01

Descargas

Cómo citar

Rocha, R. G., Ferreira, E., Serafini, A., Costa, L. P., Nogueira, A. J., Malvasio, A., … Fonseca, C. (2015). The usefulness of different methods for biodiversity surveys in the Amazonia/Cerrado ecotone. Natureza Online, 13(1), 33–44. Recuperado a partir de https://naturezaonline.com.br/revista/article/view/128

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a