Apolitical conservation, unapparent results

Authors

  • Marcelo Sathler Universidade Vila Velha

Abstract

In many parts of the world, there is evidence of increasing shortage of essential natural resources, which may force humankind to endure general scarcity in the coming decades. Scientific information supports social and environmental complaints, but claims are hardly heeded by government officials. As researchers advocate change, their frustration is noticeable. This paper argues for a new perspective on the conservation of natural resources. To that end, the academic community must change its attitude and focus on identifying the players responsible for public policies, as well as on understanding how these policies are formulated. It is inevitable to acknowledge that biologists, ecologists and conservationists usually lack influence on high-level decisions. Research alone is not able to promote the changes needed by modern civilization. Perhaps the biodiversity conservation and sustainable development will never happen. Nonetheless, the insistence on a notably flawed model is not consistent and a change of attitude is necessary.

Keywords:

Environmental conservation, politics, environmentalism, unsustainability

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marcelo Sathler, Universidade Vila Velha

Pesquisador do Núcleo de Estudos Urbanos e Socioambientais - NEUS. Universidade Vila Velha.

References

Birkland TA (2001) An Introduction to the policy process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making. New York, M. E. Sharpe.

Bonavides P (2012) Ciência Política. São Paulo, Editora Malheiros.

Brammer H (2010) After the Bangladesh Flood Action Plan: Looking to the future. Environmental Hazards 9: 118–130.

Clark TW, Willard AR, Cromley CM (2000) Foundations of Natural Resources Policy and Management. New Haven, Yale University Press. Clark TW (2002) The Policy Process: A Practical Guide for Natural Resource Professionals. New Haven, Yale University Press.

Cochran CE, Malone EF (1995) Public Policy: Perspectives and Choices. Colorado, Lynne Rienner.

Cochran CE, Mayer LC, Carr TR (1999) American Public Policy: An Introduction. New York, St. Martin’s Press.

CMMD (1991) Comissão Mundial Sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento. Nosso Futuro Comum. Rio de Janeiro, Editora da Fundação Getúlio Vargas.

Dye TR (1992) Understanding Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall. Ezrow NM, Frantz E (2011) Dictators and Dictatorships. New York, The Continuum International Publishing Group.

Gray C, Mueller V (2012) Drought and Population Mobility in Rural Ethiopia. World Development 40 (1) 134-145.

Groom MJ, Meffe GK, Carroll CR. (org.) (2006) Principles of Conservation Biology. 3a ed. Massachusets, Sinauer.

Kok A, Lotze W, Jaarsveld SV (org.) (2009) Natural Resources, the Environment and Conflict. Durban, ACCORD.

Meffe GK, Carroll CR. (Org.) (1997) Principles of Conservation Biology. 2a ed. Massachusets, Sinauer.

Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005a) Ecosystems and human well- being: current state and trends. Washington, World Resources Institute. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005b) Ecosystems and Human Well- being: Desertification Synthesis. Washington, World Resources Institute.

Morin E (2006). Os Sete Saberes Necessário à Educação do Futuro. 11 ed. São Paulo, Cortez.

Nana-Sinkam SC (1995) Land and Environmental Degradation and Desertification in Africa. Roma, FAO.

Nierenberg D, Halweil B (orgs) (2011) State of The World: Report on Progress Toward a Sustainable Society. Washington, World Watch Institute.

Paludo AV (2012) Administração Pública. 2. Rio de Janeiro, Elsevier-Campus.

Peters BG (1999) American Public Policy: Promise and Performance. 9a ed. New York, Chatham House/Seven Rivers.

Souza C (2006) Políticas Públicas: uma revisão de literatura. Sociologias. 8 (16): 20-45.

UN (2012) United Nations Interagency Framework Team for Preventive Action. Land and Conflict: Toolkit and Guidance for Preventing and Managing Land and Natural Resources Conflict. New York, United Nations.

UNESCO (2012) United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Managing Water Under Uncertainty and Risk: United Nations World Water Development Report 4. Paris, UNESCO CLD.

UNHCR (2002) United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. A critical time for refugees and their environment. Revista Refugees 127.

WWF (2012) World Wildlife Fund. Living Planet Report 2012: biodiversity, biocapacity and better choices. Switzerland, WWF.

How to Cite

Sathler, M. (2015). Apolitical conservation, unapparent results. Natureza Online, 13(2), 54–55. Retrieved from https://naturezaonline.com.br/revista/article/view/144